<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Album Reviews &#8211; TheBRHM.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thebrhm.com/category/album-reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thebrhm.com</link>
	<description>Black Rock &#38; Heavy Metal Music For Your Ears...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 05:41:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Heavy Metal History: Slayer’s Reign in Blood Changed Everything in 28 Minutes.</title>
		<link>https://thebrhm.com/2026/09/10/heavy-metal-history-slayers-reign-in-blood-changed-everything-in-28-minutes/</link>
					<comments>https://thebrhm.com/2026/09/10/heavy-metal-history-slayers-reign-in-blood-changed-everything-in-28-minutes/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terry Poole]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 05:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Heavy Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mainstream Heavy Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy Metal - Blast From The Past]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Album Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BH]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thebrhm.com/?p=2360</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Slayer celebrates 40 years of Reign in Blood, the 28-minute thrash metal landmark that remains vicious, influential and remarkably free of filler.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(<strong>TheBRHM.com</strong>) Forty years is a long time for anything to stay dangerous. Most records that old have softened into nostalgia by now, the kind of thing you nod along to at a cookout while somebody younger asks who these guys even are. Then there&#8217;s the heavy metal monster <strong>Slayer</strong> let loose in October of 1986, and watching Araya, King, Holt and Bostaph tear through it front to back on this anniversary run, you realize not one degree of heat has leaked out.</p>
<p>They kicked off their first show of 2026 by dusting off six Reign in Blood cuts that had gone unplayed since 2014, 2015 or 2019, then dropped the entire sequence in order, the way it was always meant to hit. It marked the first time Slayer had performed the full album live since 2014. No warmup. Zero mercy. Just the thing itself, start to finish, in roughly the time it takes to microwave a frozen dinner and eat it.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the wild part almost nobody dwells on. Reign in Blood clocks in at just under 29 minutes. Ten cuts, in and out before most modern acts have even finished their intro. Yet if you polled a room full of lifers about the single most important document thrash ever coughed up, this half hour of violence wins going away, no argument, everybody home before dark.</p>
<p>How does something so brief throw such a long shadow? A big chunk of the answer sits behind the mixing board. Rick Rubin, already making noise with Run DMC and the Beastie Boys, had never produced a metal LP before, and that outsider ear turned into the secret weapon. So he yanked out nearly all that reverb. Where a lot of that decade buried its guitars in echo chasing something huge, he flipped it and pulled the whole mix tight against your skull. No unnecessary air, no gloss, nothing sitting between you and the riff. Sounds like the amps got dragged into your lap, and I mean that as praise.</p>
<p>Behind the kit sat Dave Lombardo, playing like a man trying to punch straight through the floorboards. His performance on the opener alone rewrote what folks believed two feet and two hands could pull off at that tempo. King and Hanneman didn&#8217;t so much trade solos as claw at each other, two guitars snarling and diving like they had a score to settle. Araya up front didn&#8217;t oversing a single line. He carried the ugliest lyrics anybody had written with the flat calm of somebody reading you the evening news, and that restraint made them scarier.</p>
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter wp-image-2362" src="https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/image-2026-09-10T003643.868.png" alt="Heavy Metal History: Slayer’s Reign in Blood Changed Everything in 28 Minutes." width="441" height="522" srcset="https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/image-2026-09-10T003643.868.png 776w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/image-2026-09-10T003643.868-254x300.png 254w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/image-2026-09-10T003643.868-768x909.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 441px) 100vw, 441px" /></p>
<p>Speaking of grim. The opening salvo, Hanneman&#8217;s Angel of Death, dragged Josef Mengele and the horrors of Auschwitz into nearly five unblinking minutes, and the controversy started before plenty of listeners ever heard a note. Def Jam&#8217;s distributor, Columbia/CBS, refused to handle the record because of Angel of Death and its subject matter. Rick Rubin ultimately found another route through Geffen. Loud voices cried Nazi sympathy, missing the plain truth that describing evil and endorsing it are two very different acts. Controversy did what controversy always does, of course, turning a troubled thrash release into required listening.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s where I plant my flag in the dirt. The reason this beast still lands harder than records three times its size is the exact quality some critics once used to dismiss it. There&#8217;s no fat on the bone. None whatsoever. Each of those ten pieces shows up, handles its brutal business, and clears the room. Most run under three. A couple barely crack two. You never hit that soggy midsection where a band obviously ran dry and decided a sprawling doom crawl might fill the gap. Nobody sneaks in a ballad to catch their breath. Slayer never learned how to waste your time. From the first shriek of Angel of Death to the thunderclap that kicks open Raining Blood, the whole ride is one clenched fist.</p>
<p>Stack that against what gets sold as a major statement today. Plenty of newer outfits drop 70 minutes across 14 songs and dare you to survive the whole slog. Technically jaw dropping, no question. Polished within an inch of its life, sure. Somewhere around the ninth track, though, your focus wanders, because not every idea earned its spot and deep down the writer knew it and kept the thing anyway. Bloat wearing ambition as a costume. More is not heavier. It&#8217;s just longer.</p>
<p>These four understood a lesson that keeps getting lost in the streaming era, where the temptation to pad a lineup for playlist math is real. A knockout works because it arrives clean and it arrives once. Nobody needs 15 rounds to remember getting dropped. Reign in Blood is the genre&#8217;s equivalent of a right hand you never saw coming, and your jaw still throbs at the memory.</p>
<p>The ripple spread everywhere you look. Death metal swiped the tempo and the darkness. Grindcore grabbed the brevity and shoved it to an absurd extreme. Damn near every extreme act since has traced a strand of its DNA back to that furious half hour, which is a strange fate for a heavy metal record barely longer than a sitcom. Rolling Stone eventually parked the LP at number 6 on its rundown of the 100 greatest metal albums ever made. Kerrang! went even further, once naming it the “Heaviest Album Ever Made.” Neither distinction reads like hype once the needle drops.</p>
<p>Which carries us back to right now, and the strange weight of these commemorative Slayer gigs. Hanneman passed in 2013, and Gary Holt shoulders his parts with the reverence of somebody fully aware he&#8217;s filling boots that can&#8217;t really be filled. Lombardo&#8217;s out of the picture too, so Paul Bostaph takes on that impossible drum assignment. Araya and King soldier on, grayer now and four decades removed from the young men who recorded the thing, still conjuring the old fury on command. Something close to sacred hums underneath the sight of aging men honoring a piece of their youth this fiercely, flatly refusing to let time sand it down.</p>
<p>I caught myself choking up a little over clips from these performances, and trust me, that doesn&#8217;t happen often. It&#8217;s the sound of guys who could coast on the catalog forever choosing instead to prove the case one more time. Play it. All of it. Let the kids in the pit and the veterans in the back settle the whole debate together.</p>
<p>Forty candles, 28 minutes, not a wasted second among them. They carved out something lean and vicious and permanent while a fair share of their peers busied themselves padding twin LPs that history already forgot. That gospel still runs through heavy metal today, and it&#8217;s a simple one. Hit the stage, do maximum damage, then clear out before they&#8217;re ready for you to go. Nobody has to sit through your filler because there isn&#8217;t any. Slayer figured that out four decades ago, and I&#8217;ll just say it: no heavy metal act since has left a bigger stain on the floor.</p>
<p>Staff Writer; <strong>Terry Poole</strong></p>
<p>This brother brings sharp ears, deep respect, and real passion to every heavy metal riff, rock record, and overlooked gem he covers for TheBRHM&#8230; He writes for fans who still believe loud music should have soul, history, and meaning&#8230;</p>
<p>One may contact him at <strong><a href="mailto:TerryP@TheBRHM.com">TerryP@TheBRHM.com</a></strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thebrhm.com/2026/09/10/heavy-metal-history-slayers-reign-in-blood-changed-everything-in-28-minutes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debut Dive: Gama Bomb Survival of the Fastest.</title>
		<link>https://thebrhm.com/2026/09/04/gama-bomb-survival-of-the-fastest-thrash-metal-review/</link>
					<comments>https://thebrhm.com/2026/09/04/gama-bomb-survival-of-the-fastest-thrash-metal-review/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James “Metal” Swift Jr.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 02:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Heavy Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mainstream Heavy Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy Metal - Blast From The Past]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Album Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BH]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thebrhm.com/?p=2322</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Gama Bomb’s Survival of the Fastest delivers fast, wild thrash metal packed with zombies, sci-fi, crossover energy, and nonstop headbanging.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(<strong>TheBRHM.com</strong>) The 2000s was period that saw a lot of more modern thrash bands put out their early works. You had some that went the extended demo route of releasing several demos and splits in the early 2000s before dropping their debut. Then you had those who ran one or two demos and maybe an EP before dropping their debut early or midway through the decade.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter wp-image-2323" src="https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Debut-Dive-Gama-Bomb-Survival-of-the-Fastest.jpg" alt="Debut Dive: Gama Bomb Survival of the Fastest." width="415" height="415" srcset="https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Debut-Dive-Gama-Bomb-Survival-of-the-Fastest.jpg 700w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Debut-Dive-Gama-Bomb-Survival-of-the-Fastest-300x300.jpg 300w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Debut-Dive-Gama-Bomb-Survival-of-the-Fastest-150x150.jpg 150w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Debut-Dive-Gama-Bomb-Survival-of-the-Fastest-500x500.jpg 500w" sizes="(max-width: 415px) 100vw, 415px" /></p>
<h2>Gama Bomb: Wild Zombie-Slaying Thrash</h2>
<p>The UK’s Gama Bomb falls into category two but their debut album <em>Survival of the Fastest </em>was an interesting look at what could be in the future. I say “interesting” as I remember there being some fans who had gotten bored with the young thrash bands because there were so many.</p>
<p>Not only were there <em>a lot</em> of them from <em>many places</em>, you could pick up on specific trends in thrash quickly because a good amount of bands would have a similar sound.</p>
<p>For me, this was perfect. I love from this period in part because it’s a young discography for many active bands. Gama Bomb’s <em>Survival of the Fastest </em>came out in 2005 and they’ve released eight albums in total. This isn’t four or five decades of classics and questionable projects to go through.</p>
<h2>Survival of the Fastest – Side A</h2>
<p>Gama Bomb’s debut also happened to come out when I got into metal but I wouldn’t get into it for another year since I was going through the thrash OGs at the time.</p>
<p>Getting into <em>Survival of the Fastest,</em> we have an 11-track, 29 minute speeder. The sound of the album overall isn’t what you’d get from the motorbastard or blackened thrash end of retro thrash influenced by Sodom, Motorhead and Bathory. This is more of the crossover stuff influenced more like Anthrax and Suicidal Tendencies.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s high energy, fast as hell thrash and this album is one for the late 80s and 90s kids or wrong-decade headbangers.</p>
<p>The A-side includes the first six tracks “Zombie Creeping Flesh”, “Steel Teeth (The Metal Jaw)”, “Zombie Command”, “Atomizer”, “Fortified Zone” and “Racists!” I enjoyed all of the A-side to some degree but all tracks except “Racists!” hit hard enough to get that replay after the song or midway through the track.</p>
<p>“Zombie Creeping Flesh” and “Steel Teeth (The Metal Jaw” were the standouts on this side. Don’t sleep on “Zombie Command” and “Atomizer”. They don’t fall short of the two standouts and “Atomizer” is a track that could battle the opener for best two songs on the side.</p>
<p><strong>Standout Tracks: </strong>Zombie Creeping Flesh*, Steel Teeth (The Metal Jaw)*, Atomizer</p>
<h2>B-Side</h2>
<p>The remainder of the album features my two favorite tracks on the album. “Hell Trucker” just rips, it’s exactly my kind of thrash speed-wise and it’s my pick for Song of the Album. The other banger here is “Bullet Belt”. Like “Hell Trucker” and the album as a whole, this is mindless headbanging thrash.</p>
<p>There’s little in the way of social commentary that is going to give you a different perspective on things. If anything it boosts a dislike of racists and Nazis in a fast and fun way but even that’s minor. No, this is for those of us who like zombies, sci-fi, and metal. It’s a formula that Gama Bomb came in with and continue to use today…and it still works!</p>
<p>As for the other three tracks on this side, the B-side opens with “Scientists?” which is a super science/evil science tune that keeps the speed of the album. It’s fine and the same can be said for “Skellington Crew”. Coming in before “Bullet Belt”, it’s actually a good track that also benefits from following “Nuke the Skeets”.</p>
<p>“Nuke the Skeets” is the shortest track on the album and kind of a fun spoken word track at 13 seconds. It’s a fine buffer following “Hell Trucker”.</p>
<p><strong>Strongest Tracks: </strong>Hell Trucker**, Bullet Belt*</p>
<h2>Strength of the Opener and Closer</h2>
<p>“Zombie Creeping Flesh” is a decent enough opening track but there are a few candidates that probably would’ve done better. “Steel Teeth” was a song that had more bite while “Hell Trucker” has more bite than both and would’ve been an incredible opening track.</p>
<p>Also, swapping “ZCF” with either of those songs wouldn’t throw the album off. Many of the songs have a same-y sound to them with a few really popping the ear more than the rest. That’s the kind of party we’ve got going on here.</p>
<p>“Bullet Belt” is perfect where it is as the album closer. I enjoy albums that end on a loud and fast tracks the most and Gama Bomb picked a great closing tune.</p>
<p>Overall, this was a pretty good album. One thing that hurts it is the production of the time. It’s very noticeable if you were to check out <em>Citizen Brain, </em>which was released in 2008 and features all of <em>Survival of the Fastest </em>along with some extras.</p>
<p>Honestly, this album crawled so that <em>Citizen Brain </em>could fly. Check it out!</p>
<p>Staff Writer; <strong>James “Metal” Swift Jr.</strong></p>
<p>This talented writer is also a podcast host, and comic book fan who loves all things old school. One may also find him on Twitter at; <strong><a href="https://twitter.com/metalswift">metalswift</a></strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thebrhm.com/2026/09/04/gama-bomb-survival-of-the-fastest-thrash-metal-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Metallica’s Black Album Changed Heavy Metal Forever.</title>
		<link>https://thebrhm.com/2026/08/24/metallica-black-album-heavy-metal-legacy-fan-backlash/</link>
					<comments>https://thebrhm.com/2026/08/24/metallica-black-album-heavy-metal-legacy-fan-backlash/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kirk Robinson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 21:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Album Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mainstream Heavy Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy Metal - Blast From The Past]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BH]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thebrhm.com/?p=2279</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Metallica’s Black Album transformed heavy metal in 1991, sold over 35 million copies worldwide, and sparked a debate that continues in 2026.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(<strong>TheBRHM.com</strong>) Something cracked open in the summer of 1991, and you felt it before you could explain it. &#8220;Enter Sandman&#8221; came slinking out of car speakers with that heavy, dragging riff, and all of a sudden the guys who used to live on the fringes were sitting right there in everybody&#8217;s living room. Your cousin knew the words. The girl who only spun new jack swing knew the words. Grandmothers hummed it in the grocery line. None of it seemed normal, and none of it would ever fully reverse.</p>
<p>Rewind a few years and the picture looked completely different. Ride the Lightning and Master of Puppets had been savage, sprawling beasts, built on galloping riffs and arrangements that ran past the seven minute mark without so much as a shrug. &#8230;And Justice for All pushed the whole idea to a brittle, clanging edge, so dense and dry that it practically dared you to love it. The band was already headlining arenas, and &#8220;One&#8221; had brought its sound to MTV, but widespread radio domination still felt like somebody else&#8217;s game. What they chased was speed and a machined kind of precision, riffs cut tight enough to draw blood and cranked loud enough to rattle teeth loose in your skull. The indifference was not an accident. They leaned on it hard.</p>
<p>Then Bob Rock walked through the door, and the corners got sanded down. The eponymous release that everyone simply calls the Black Album traded fury for weight. Tracks got shorter. Grooves got fatter. The production finally breathed instead of choking. Newsted&#8217;s bass sat where you could hear it after Justice had buried him in the mix. Lars leaned into groove over speed. Kirk trimmed the fireworks so each tune could stretch its legs. Every choice served the song instead of the ego, and that discipline is a big reason the thing still hits like a truck.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter wp-image-2281" src="https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/imageedit_1_9699756402.png" alt="Metallica’s Black Album Changed Heavy Metal Forever." width="973" height="308" srcset="https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/imageedit_1_9699756402.png 1443w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/imageedit_1_9699756402-300x95.png 300w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/imageedit_1_9699756402-1024x324.png 1024w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/imageedit_1_9699756402-768x243.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 973px) 100vw, 973px" /></p>
<p>The payoff landed with the force of a meteor. Twenty times platinum in America, more than thirty five million copies scattered across the planet, and a commercial run that remains nearly untouchable more than three decades on. No band rooted in thrash had ever reached those numbers before, and arguably none since has matched what that No. 1 debut set loose. This was not a hit. It became a permanent fixture, the kind of release that stops belonging to a genre and starts belonging to everybody.</p>
<p>Here is where the story splits clean in two. For millions of newcomers, this was the front door into heavier music. A teenager who had never gone heavier than Guns N&#8217; Roses could follow &#8220;Sad But True&#8221; or &#8220;Wherever I May Roam&#8221; down into a world that used to sit off the map entirely. Metallica had already conquered arenas, but the crossover pushed the band deeper into stadiums, award shows, and bedrooms out in the suburbs where plenty of listeners had never given thrash a second thought. That expansion was real, and it fed an appetite that smaller acts would live off for years. Doors that had been bolted shut swung wide, and a hundred bands crawled through them.</p>
<p>But the folks who had been there since Kill &#8216;Em All felt something twist in their gut. To them, the slower tempos read as surrender. &#8220;Nothing Else Matters&#8221; was a ballad, no hedging, strings and all, and Hetfield&#8217;s voice cracked with a tenderness the mosh pit never requested. The purists muttered about selling out. They pointed at the gloss on it, at hooks that snagged you and refrains you could shout back before a song even ended, and they grieved the breakneck thing that once sent parents lunging for the volume knob. The rough edges were sanded off. Smooth, to a crowd that fell for the danger in the first place, read a whole lot like a white flag.</p>
<p>And yet that betrayal narrative was always a little selective. These were the same writers who gave the world &#8220;Fade to Black&#8221; and &#8220;One,&#8221; who understood a quiet passage could gut a listener harder than any blast of speed. The seeds of tenderness were planted long before Bob Rock ever showed up. What shifted was the ratio, plus the nerve to put a slow burner front and center rather than tucking it away deep in a track list. The crime, if you want to call it that, was mostly about confidence.</p>
<p>What came afterward only sharpened the argument. Load and Reload arrived with short hair, eyeliner, and a bluesy swagger that felt light years from the thrash gospel. The crew chased alternative rock while the ground kept moving under everybody&#8217;s feet. Then the Napster lawsuit turned the four of them into the face of corporate greed for a generation of downloaders, fair or not. St. Anger showed up sounding like a garbage can tumbling down a staircase, and the Some Kind of Monster documentary let the entire planet watch the founders bicker their way through therapy. Every last chapter here traced back, some way or another, to the crossroads of 1991. Fame that enormous carries a bill, and it kept arriving in the mail.</p>
<p>So was the price too high? Depends on who is running the math. Look at it one way and you see a pack of ferocious innovators who traded their teeth for a mansion. The tape trading kids who once believed they guarded a secret watched that secret get sold to the shopping mall. There is grief in that, and it is honest grief. Pretty numbers do not buy it off.</p>
<p>Flip the ledger, though, and it reads completely different. Without that crossover, does heavy music ever reach the loner in the tiny town with no scene, no store, no allies? Probably not with the same punch. The eponymous juggernaut dragged a whole underground into daylight and handed countless nobodies a reason to believe they could pack a room too. Strip away the debate for a second and the songwriting on that beast is bulletproof. &#8220;The Unforgiven&#8221; still lands like a body shot. &#8220;Holier Than Thou&#8221; snarls as mean now as the day it dropped. Craft that sturdy does not happen by luck, and it does not crumble because a handful of gatekeepers felt jilted.</p>
<p>The truth probably lives inside the tension itself. You cannot fully pry the win apart from the wound. That batch of songs made the four of them immortal and also chained them to a version of triumph they spent the next fifteen years wrestling with, sometimes gracefully, often not. It gave the culture a bigger tent and, in the very same breath, blurred the wild identity that got the tent raised in the first place.</p>
<p>Well into 2026, none of the old fire has stopped paying off. The eponymous set never really left the shelves. It has logged more than 840 weeks on the Billboard 200 by now, and it was the fourth album in history to reach the 800 week milestone, an exclusive club that has since grown to six. Whenever the band tours, songs from that record remain fixtures in the setlist, with &#8220;Enter Sandman&#8221; often arriving near the end. Drop that riff in a stadium now and the place comes unglued, phones in the air, grandparents and grandkids screaming the same line back. Half the crowd was not alive when it dropped and they know it cold regardless. That kind of reach makes its own case.</p>
<p>So the clean verdict never shows up. Call it a cash grab and you are not wrong. Frame it as a group smashing clean through its own ceiling and you are not wrong there either. Both things happened on a single release, and that contradiction is what keeps the argument going at the bar on a Saturday night. Nobody bothers fighting this hard over a legacy with no scars on it. The scars are half the reason a heavy release from 1991 still feels alive while so much of its era quietly gathers dust.</p>
<p>Staff Writer<strong>; Kirk Robinson</strong></p>
<p>This man is a <em>Rockhead</em> with a deep appreciation for rock, country, folk, blues, heavy metal and the musical traditions that connect them. He writes about artists, albums, music history and the sounds that continue to shape generations. Feel free to contact him at <strong><a href="mailto:KirkR@TheBRHM.com">KirkR@TheBRHM.com</a></strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thebrhm.com/2026/08/24/metallica-black-album-heavy-metal-legacy-fan-backlash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where&#8217;s the Ripper Era Judas Priest Albums.</title>
		<link>https://thebrhm.com/2026/07/02/wheres-the-ripper-era-judas-priest-albums/</link>
					<comments>https://thebrhm.com/2026/07/02/wheres-the-ripper-era-judas-priest-albums/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James “Metal” Swift Jr.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 23:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mainstream Heavy Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy Metal - Blast From The Past]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Album Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy Metal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thebrhm.com/?p=1936</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A look at Judas Priest’s Tim “Ripper” Owens era, Jugulator, Demolition, and why those albums remain debated but important parts of the band’s history.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(<strong>TheBRHM.com</strong>) It’s not unusual to see bands with a past they tend to not acknowledge or don’t include in their discographies. Part of this is that the band becomes so associated or known with a sound or genre that those early albums or that transitional album has to go into the vault.</p>
<p><span data-olk-copy-source="MessageBody">Originally, we were going to look at three bands of this ilk but let’s look at Judas Priest&#8217;s previous attempts at modernizing and how those albums played out.</span></p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter wp-image-1943" src="https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Wheres-the-Ripper-Era-Judas-Priest-Albums.-1-1024x599.png" alt="Where's the Ripper Era Judas Priest Albums." width="660" height="386" srcset="https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Wheres-the-Ripper-Era-Judas-Priest-Albums.-1-1024x599.png 1024w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Wheres-the-Ripper-Era-Judas-Priest-Albums.-1-300x175.png 300w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Wheres-the-Ripper-Era-Judas-Priest-Albums.-1-768x449.png 768w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Wheres-the-Ripper-Era-Judas-Priest-Albums.-1-1536x898.png 1536w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Wheres-the-Ripper-Era-Judas-Priest-Albums.-1.png 1584w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 660px) 100vw, 660px" /></p>
<h2>Judas Priest and the 14 Year Run</h2>
<p>It’s always easy to start with Priest for most things. Long-time metal and Judas Priest fans will know which albums tend to get left out of streaming music catalogs. Released in 1997 and 2001 respectively, <em>Jugulator </em>and <em>Demolition </em>are two albums that came about in the Tim “Ripper” Owens period of the band.</p>
<p>After roughly 19 years as lead singer, Rob Halford decided to dip out and see what else he could do musically and just do life. Priest had been heavily active throughout the 1970s and 1980s churning out quality albums, some divisive pieces, and delivering some exciting live performances on their tours.</p>
<p>Just looking at their discography from <em>Rocka Rolla </em>until <em>Ram It Down, </em>you’re looking at 12 albums in 14 years. Total iron horses. One issue that arises is creativity. Sure, they have the work ethic and had been putting projects together with a high level of quality overall sans a lengthy break but those creative juices need time to replenish.</p>
<h2>Early Attempts at Being Hip</h2>
<p>This kind of dovetails into the other issue: change with the times. The heavily sci-fi, love-of-metal, and life themes of the band were good throughout the 70s and early 80s but the rock and metal industry was changing rapidly in the late 80s. Glam rock was hot and bands wanted their bag. The genre had some impact of Judas Priest as heard in 1986’s <em>Turbo.</em></p>
<p>I felt that Priest was at its best just evoking the word of the Metal Gods at varying speeds while sprinkling one or two romance or veiled sex tunes per album. A good mix where even the romance tracks are heavy as hell. <em>Turbo </em>is the band’s second attempt at hanging with what’s hot and while I actually like the album (there are bangers here, folks), I can see that the glam-tinged approach didn’t take well to my fellow Judas Priest hardcores.</p>
<p>Again: long run of the same approach for over a decade. I’ll let them slide on <em>Turbo</em>. It’s not a bad album at all, it’s just not as heavy as other releases. Their first attempt came in 1981 with <em>Point of Entry </em>when new wave and arena rock were big mainstream-wise. The band took cues from arena rock and turned out a fun album that was similar to <em>Turbo </em>in a lack of heaviness.</p>
<p>What I like to check is what albums these releases are sandwiched between. <em>Point of Entry </em>came after <em>British Steel, </em>a good project but an even better international introduction. The album came before the incredible <em>Screaming for Vengeance. </em>So, treat <em>PoE </em>as a brief break to see if the hook catches any new fans that don’t care for heavy Priest.</p>
<p><em>Turbo </em>fell between two monsters in <em>Defenders of the Faith </em>and <em>Ram It Down. </em>That’s a tough roll but the late 70s and the 80s was mostly a murderers’ row of very strong albums. It was going to be viewed as a drop off to some and an enjoyable side trip to others. A mixed reception, I suppose.</p>
<h2>1990 and The Ripper Arrives</h2>
<p>The Metal Gods would kick off the new decade with another tempt at hip with my favorite Priest release: <em>Painkiller. </em>It was released in this interesting time where the thrash bands had already thrashed throughout the late 80s.</p>
<p>Some bands were slowing it down and delivering more layered music in part distancing from thrash or just adding something new. Other thrash acts just kept thrashing or moved into other extreme subgenres. Of course, you had those bands that ended or went on an extended hiatus.</p>
<p>Glam metal had gotten its hands on the power ballad nuke, so there were a couple of those that actually became some of those bands’ better known songs. However, glam metal was about to get wiped in popularity by fast-growing grunge and groove metal bands. Never mind the growth of west coast and east coast hip-hop at that time.</p>
<p>Apparently, there was only so much air time for metal (and later, music videos) on MTV at the time. I can’t personally speak on how the radio was going for metal at the time since I wasn’t regularly listening to it until the late 1990s but I don’t reckon it was any better.</p>
<p><em>Painkiller </em>releases and it’s like Judas Priest was attempting to catch up when other bands that regularly did that kind of speed and aggression had matured. In a way, JP had matured as well then again, I’m very biased towards this album since it hits every I want in a speed metal album from start to finish.</p>
<p>Fortunately, it came in largely uncontested as it followed <em>Ram It Down </em>and Priest had a little more time between the albums. When there’s time between musical projects, films, books, or games that’s when you have to bring something truly amazing. You can’t bring more of the same and Judas Priest understood the assignment.</p>
<p>Then lead singer Rob Halford leaves the band and forms the band Fight and later own forms Two, giving him the means to dip a toe into groove metal a bit. Now Judas Priest gets that extended hiatus. They would load up on compilations before picking up Tim “Ripper” Owens in 1996 as their lead singer.</p>
<h2>Jugulator and Demolition</h2>
<p>The band dropped <em>Jugulator </em>in 1997 and I’d eventually listen to it in my first Judas Priest binge a decade later. Prior to that I’d heard Halford’s <em>Resurrection </em>and <em>Crucible. </em>While those were a few years later, that cleaner production and more aggressive approach was familiar. The guitars in Halford could have that heavy, crunchy bite or sound crisper for something more like an anthem or one of Halford’s romance tunes.</p>
<p><em>Jugulator </em>featured a more aggressive, thrashy—and darker—Judas Priest. It was like “Turn the darkness up some from <em>Painkiller”. </em>Both albums I felt were fine, I preferred <em>Jugulator </em>much more. They keep some of the Judas Priest tropes including my favorite: epic character songs. You don’t exactly get “Painkiller”, “The Sentinel”, or “Exciter” but they’re solid offerings.</p>
<p>I’ve read reviews and a few posts discussing the Ripper era and it’s a mix of views. Some felt that Ripper is powerful singer but wasn’t a good fit for Priest. The songwriting was a topic of discussion, the overall tone of the albums, and so on. Then you had those who at least liked <em>Jugulator </em>or they’re similar to me and liked songs from those albums but didn’t care for the albums overall.</p>
<p>When streaming music became a thing, I noticed that <em>Jugulator </em>and <em>Demolition </em>weren’t in the discography on Spotify. Just <em>Painkiller </em>to <em>Angel of Retribution.</em> Having looked at Apple Music recently and I see <em>Demolition </em>is in their albums and that’s the album I felt was the weaker of the Ripper era.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s always interesting to see that because it raises questions. In Judas Priest’s case, there’s some legal stuff preventing it from appearing. Also, you could say there was some other distancing from that era with Halford returning even if Halford himself feels they’re valid entries. For our wrestling fans, it’s similar to the question of if Jeff Jarrett was ever a member of the Four Horsemen.</p>
<p>The face of the group might say it’s acceptable but everyone else is either mixed on the notion or shuts it down. Add in legal restrictions and you get an situation that can look like erasure of that era. It’s s shame because it’s part of the band’s overall history and <em>Jugulator </em>was a fine release.</p>
<p>Overall, I wouldn’t say it’s a Pantera and the Terry Glaze era situation.</p>
<div class="single-content has-left-section">
<div class="entry-content clearfix">
<p>Staff Writer;<strong> James “Metal” Swift Jr.</strong></p>
<p>This talented writer is also a podcast host, and comic book fan who loves all things old school. One may also find him on Twitter at; <strong><a href="http://twitter.com/metalswift">metalswift</a></strong>.</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thebrhm.com/2026/07/02/wheres-the-ripper-era-judas-priest-albums/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debut Dives: 3 Inches of Blood &#8211; Battlecry Under a Wintersun.</title>
		<link>https://thebrhm.com/2026/06/28/debut-dives-3-inches-of-blood-battlecry-under-a-wintersun/</link>
					<comments>https://thebrhm.com/2026/06/28/debut-dives-3-inches-of-blood-battlecry-under-a-wintersun/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James “Metal” Swift Jr.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 02:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Heavy Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mainstream Heavy Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy Metal - Blast From The Past]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Album Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BH]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thebrhm.com/?p=1919</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A look back at 3 Inches of Blood’s debut album Battlecry Under a Wintersun, its fantasy driven power metal, dual vocals, strongest tracks, and place in the band’s discography.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(<strong>TheBRHM.com</strong>) 3 Inches of Blood is a Canadian power metal act from British Columbia known for their fast tempo of use of two vocalists. That was probably the main thing that gave 3IOB that little extra umph. In each of their full length releases the act always had the goods as far as strings and battery but it was when you realized they had two vocalists that you get the curiosity listens.</p>
<p>Running two vocalists is always an interesting approach. In 3IOB’s case, it was even more interesting when your primary singer (Cam Pipes) had some <em>Painkiller-</em>mode Rob Halford clean vox action going on and the singer handling the chorus and duet stuff (Jamie Hooper) with some modern (for the early 2000s) harsh vox.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1922" src="https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Debut-Dives-3-Inches-of-Blood-Battlecry-Under-a-Wintersun.jpg" alt="Debut Dives: 3 Inches of Blood - Battlecry Under a Wintersun." width="316" height="316" srcset="https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Debut-Dives-3-Inches-of-Blood-Battlecry-Under-a-Wintersun.jpg 316w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Debut-Dives-3-Inches-of-Blood-Battlecry-Under-a-Wintersun-300x300.jpg 300w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Debut-Dives-3-Inches-of-Blood-Battlecry-Under-a-Wintersun-150x150.jpg 150w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 316px) 100vw, 316px" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>This is also one of the things that garnered some opposing views on the band. From what I’ve seen, it’s not the existence of both vocals at the same time, it&#8217;s how they intermingle on releases in addition to lyrics that have been viewed as basic fantasy material.</p>
<p>Mind you, I love that low fantasy, sword and sorcery focus and I don’t necessarily need all the lore and intrigues of different nations and treaties when there’s an evil sorcerer or some beast that needs clapping. I’m here for sword-swinging, orc-slaying action and 3 Inches of Blood typically delivered.</p>
<p>Most fans introduction to 3 Inches of Blood was probably through <em>Advance and Vanquish, </em>a very good intro that I enjoyed. It was one of my purchases through the “4 CDs for one cent” schemes we’d occasionally get in the mail or in a magazine.</p>
<h2>3 Inches of Blood’s First Adventure: Battlecry Under a Wintersun</h2>
<p>Normally, I’d go into side A and side B separately, but the version available on Apple Music features some bonus tracks that piqued my interest. Full disclosure: I listened to the follow-up release <em>Advance and Vanquish </em>way before I got to the debut. Hell, I listened to everything post-<em>Battlecry Under a Wintersun. </em>This is the kind of power metal I dig. It’s as if U.S power metal OGs Omen or Jag Panzer had their <em>Painkiller </em>and just stayed in that mode.</p>
<p>It’s a different kind of power metal than Canadian OG Thor delivered two decades earlier. The debut dropped in 2002 and comes packing a cool album, 11 tracks on the initial release, and comes in at just under 37 minutes. Our longest track here is “Hall of Heroes” at just over four minutes.</p>
<p>For most of the tracks, you’re getting a speedy 3IOB and that’s something I greatly appreciate. Even on tracks where Cam and Jamie are screeching and screaming to the tempo of the strings and percussion, the others are still just blazing through the song giving each tale told some degree of urgency or severity.</p>
<p>Lyrically, it’s a lot of wars, battles, and fantasy themes. You also get what comes with those themes: stories of bravery, anthems, figures to beware of—this album could’ve served as the start of a concept series of albums.</p>
<h2>Verdict</h2>
<p>As a debut, it’s a decent start for 3 Inches of Blood. My sole gripe would be that <em>Battlecry Under a Wintersun </em>would’ve benefited greatly from the experience, line up, and production value of <em>Advance and Vanquish. </em>I mean <em>greatly. </em>What hurts the debut is the production in regards to the vocals.</p>
<p>Something about how the voices are mixed or layered over each other doesn’t do it for me. It’s certainly not on the band since the song “Destroy the Orcs” makes it from the debut to <em>Advance and Vanquish </em>and sounds great. It’s not uncommon for production of that time or creative direction to hobble an otherwise good album. In the case of <em>Battlecry, </em>it&#8217;s just on that specific part.</p>
<p>The band hung up the gear in 2015 but were sharpening their blades again in 2023 with the <em>Fire Up the Blades </em>and <em>Here Awaits Thy Doom </em>era members. From an interview in April 2026, the band acknowledged that the music and distribution industries are very different from 2015 but aimed to start “trickling” out new stuff in 2027.</p>
<p>While I’m looking forward to new music from 3 Inches of Blood, I say give <em>Battlecry Under a Wintersun </em>a remaster. When it was released, this album showed a lot of the potential the band had. With a <em>few </em>years and better production 3 Inches of Blood would be a banger machine.</p>
<p>Every release had songs to slam and they were one of my consistent releases along with 2000s and early 2010s Darkthrone and Stormwarrior. I knew I was at least going to enjoy their album that year. If I had listened to this before <em>Advance and Vanquish, </em>I might not have put them in rotation initially. It’s a cool album but not an essential listen in their discography.</p>
<p><strong>Strongest Tracks: </strong>Destroy the Orcs, Lady Deathwish*, Curse of the Lighthouse Keeper, Balls of Ice</p>
<div class="single-content has-left-section">
<div class="entry-content clearfix">
<p>Staff Writer;<strong> James “Metal” Swift Jr.</strong></p>
<p>This talented writer is also a podcast host, and comic book fan who loves all things old school. One may also find him on Twitter at; <strong><a href="http://twitter.com/metalswift">metalswift</a></strong>.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="single-bottom-section single-widget-section">
<div id="widget_advertising-5" class="widget w-sidebar widget-ad"></div>
</div>
<aside class="reaction-section">
<div class="reaction-section-title">
<h3></h3>
</div>
</aside>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thebrhm.com/2026/06/28/debut-dives-3-inches-of-blood-battlecry-under-a-wintersun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thor’s Triumphant And The Search For Alternate Album Versions.</title>
		<link>https://thebrhm.com/2026/06/21/thors-triumphant-and-the-search-for-alternate-album-versions/</link>
					<comments>https://thebrhm.com/2026/06/21/thors-triumphant-and-the-search-for-alternate-album-versions/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James “Metal” Swift Jr.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 22:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Rock Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mainstream Heavy Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy Metal - Blast From The Past]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Album Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BH]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thebrhm.com/?p=1948</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A look back at Thor’s 2002 album Triumphant, its 2003 re-release, bonus tracks, and how better track placement changed the listening experience.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(<strong>TheBRHM.com</strong>) I’m a fan of those 80s Canadian metal bands such as thrashers Razor, Voivod, and Strappado but we’re going to get into a band we’ve touch on with Thor. The band goes back to 1973 as Centaur and began playing under the Thor name in 1977.</p>
<p>Centered around the mythos of Vancouver-based former Mr. USA and Mr. Canada bodybuilding champion Jon Mikl Thor, the eponymous band started out heavily rooted in the love of rock and adventures-with-swords fantasy.</p>
<p>Thor’s music is right up my alley thematically and you might dig them too if you’re into early Manilla Road and Manowar from the U.S, Sweden’s Heavy Load, or early Stormwitch from Germany.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter  wp-image-1947" src="https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Look-for-the-Alternate-Versions-of-Albums-Thor-Triumphant-1-1024x682.jpg" alt="Look for the Alternate Versions of Albums: Thor - Triumphant." width="476" height="317" srcset="https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Look-for-the-Alternate-Versions-of-Albums-Thor-Triumphant-1-1024x682.jpg 1024w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Look-for-the-Alternate-Versions-of-Albums-Thor-Triumphant-1-300x200.jpg 300w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Look-for-the-Alternate-Versions-of-Albums-Thor-Triumphant-1-768x512.jpg 768w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Look-for-the-Alternate-Versions-of-Albums-Thor-Triumphant-1.jpg 1280w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 476px) 100vw, 476px" /></p>
<h2>The Sixth Release of Thor: <em>Triumphant</em></h2>
<p>What we’re looking at is Thor’s 2002 full-length release <em>Triumphant </em>and the tracklisting. When the album released, it featured ten tracks and clocked in at just 58 minutes:</p>
<ol>
<li>Call of the Triumphant</li>
<li>Intercessor (from the film <em>The Intercessor: Rock n Roll Nightmare Part 2</em>)</li>
<li>Viking’s Funeral</li>
<li>Back for Blood</li>
<li>Anger</li>
<li>Thunderhawk</li>
<li>Everybody Needs a Hero</li>
<li>Fubar Is a Super Rocker (from the film <em>Fubar: The Movie</em>)</li>
<li>Hail Steeve Reeves</li>
<li>The Guardian’s Flame – An Opus by Thor I. Thunder on the Tundra, II. Crimson Twilite, III. War Hammer</li>
</ol>
<p>I remember getting this album in 2007 as part of one of those Columbia House CD-type deals where you could get a selection of CDs for the price of one. Also in that haul was the Judas Priest compilation <em>Metal Works ’73-’93. </em>At the time, I remember the album being <em>alright. </em>I definitely enjoyed “Call of the Triumphant”, loved “Intercessor” and liked “Anger” but it was either the selection of songs or the placement of the songs that didn’t really do it for me.</p>
<p>It was shame because there are Thor albums I liked such as <em>Only the Strong </em>and <em>Thunderstruck </em>where the song placement wasn’t an issue. Remember, it always helps  to have a good amount of fun or great songs on each side. It isn’t unusual to get an album that is too top-heavy with all the bangers in the first half or too bottom-heavy where you have to get through some mid or decent tracks to get to the primo songs.</p>
<h2>Look For Those Alternate Versions</h2>
<p>I admit that <em>Triumphant </em>might not be the best example of an alternate release. That’s an honor that Judas Priest’s <em>Killing Machine </em>and <em>Hell Bent for Leather </em>would take. <em>Triumphant </em>was picked because the 2003 re-release by Scratch Records featured some slight shuffling of tracks and the addition of a few songs bringing it to 15 tracks and a length of a little over 70 minutes:</p>
<ol>
<li>March to Glory</li>
<li>I Am Thor</li>
<li>Anger III</li>
<li>Call of the Triumphant</li>
<li>Intercessor (from the film <em>The Intercessor: Rock n Roll Nightmare Part 2</em>)</li>
<li>Slave</li>
<li>Viking’s Funeral</li>
<li>Back for Blood</li>
<li>GraveYard</li>
<li>Thunderhawk</li>
<li>Throwing Cars at People in Coke with Thor (ft. Full Blown AIDS)</li>
<li>The Guardian’s Flame – An Opus by Thor I. Thunder on the Tundra, II. Crimson Twilite, III. War Hammer</li>
<li>Fubar Is a Super Rocker (from the film <em>Fubar: The Movie)</em></li>
<li>Everybody Needs a Hero</li>
<li>Hail Steeve Reeves</li>
</ol>
<p>The extra songs were like decent bonus than tunes that gave the album a different sound or made for different listening experience but the <em>slight </em>tracklist shuffling made this a better listen. Sometimes you just want all the bangers in one place or in close proximity to each other. In the case of <em>Triumphant, </em>the songs I enjoyed the most from the original release make up a trifecta of tracks.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, other tracks I wasn’t initially impressed with were viewed more favorably because they were deeper into the album or had better lead-in songs. That isn’t to say that this became <em>the </em>Thor album—that’s either <em>Thunderstruck </em>or <em>Thor Against the World—</em>but this was the album where I first noticed tracklisting and song placement is everything.</p>
<p>What are some albums you believe could’ve benefited from better track placement? Are there some songs from an album you believe would be better used on a different album? Let us know in the comments!</p>
<div class="single-content has-left-section">
<div class="entry-content clearfix">
<p>Staff Writer;<strong> James “Metal” Swift Jr.</strong></p>
<p>This talented writer is also a podcast host, and comic book fan who loves all things old school. One may also find him on Twitter at; <strong><a href="http://twitter.com/metalswift">metalswift</a></strong>.</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thebrhm.com/2026/06/21/thors-triumphant-and-the-search-for-alternate-album-versions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debut Dives: Jag Panzer &#8211; Ample Destruction.</title>
		<link>https://thebrhm.com/2026/06/20/debut-dives-jag-panzer-ample-destruction/</link>
					<comments>https://thebrhm.com/2026/06/20/debut-dives-jag-panzer-ample-destruction/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James “Metal” Swift Jr.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 17:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Heavy Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mainstream Heavy Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy Metal - Blast From The Past]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Album Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BH]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thebrhm.com/?p=1926</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A look back at Jag Panzer’s 1984 debut Ample Destruction, a cult U.S. power metal classic loaded with epic vocals, battle-ready riffs, and no-skip energy.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(<strong>TheBRHM.com</strong>) While looking around on Apple Music for some older power metal to listen to, I noticed that Jag Panzer were missing their 1984 debut <em>Ample Destruction </em>and the 1994 release <em>Dissident Alliance. </em>Now, there was an album that was recorded in 1987 but that wasn’t released until 2004 as <em>Chain of Command—</em>which is also missing from Apple Music<em>. </em></p>
<p>Also, <em>Dissident Alliance </em>is a release that is best that it <em>isn’t </em>included. It would’ve been better just to drop <em>Chain of Command </em>in 1994. At any rate, we’re looking at the band’s debut <em>Ample Destruction.</em></p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter wp-image-1929" src="https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Debut-Dives-2026-Jag-Panzer-Ample-Destruction.jpg" alt="Debut Dives: Jag Panzer - Ample Destruction." width="488" height="488" srcset="https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Debut-Dives-2026-Jag-Panzer-Ample-Destruction.jpg 1000w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Debut-Dives-2026-Jag-Panzer-Ample-Destruction-300x300.jpg 300w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Debut-Dives-2026-Jag-Panzer-Ample-Destruction-150x150.jpg 150w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Debut-Dives-2026-Jag-Panzer-Ample-Destruction-768x768.jpg 768w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Debut-Dives-2026-Jag-Panzer-Ample-Destruction-500x500.jpg 500w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 488px) 100vw, 488px" /></p>
<h2>Introducing Jag Panzer</h2>
<p>Jag Panzer is a band that fans of 80s metal or power metal might be familiar with. Founded in 1981 as Tyrant, the act has featured co-founders bass player John Tetley and guitarist Mark Broidy for the bulk of its first run until 1988 and since the band’s revival in 1993. Their present vocalist is also a co-founder: Harry “The Tyrant” Conklin.</p>
<p>The Tyrant remained with the band until shortly after the release of <em>Ample Destruction </em>then left to record the 1986 release <em>Metal from Hell </em>for fellow Colorado metal act, Satan’s Host. Conklin would make his return to Jag Panzer in 1995 in time to record the band’s other classic, <em>The Fourth Judgment </em>in 1997.</p>
<p>For the early 1980s, the band’s sound reminds me of a mix of Brocas Helm’s performance on their 1984 debut <em>Into Battle </em>and Lizzy Borden’s performance on <em>Love You to Pieces. </em>Jag Panzer is one of those bands I often point to as a great example of 80s U.S power metal or epic heavy metal. They’re capable of dark, moody dungeon-exploring metal and speedier war-ready battle hymns.</p>
<p>We’re going to look at both sides of <em>Ample Destruction, </em>see what stands out on both sides of the album, and go into the opening <em>and </em>closing track. This album in its original form included nine tracks, no instrumentals or spoken word parts, and runs for just over 39 minutes.</p>
<p><em>W</em>hile the OG album isn’t on Apple Music, you can check out <em>Decade of the Nailed-Spiked Bat. </em>Released in 2003, it features the tracks from <em>Ample Destruction </em>shuffled and mixed in with tracks from the 1992 <em>Tyrants </em>EP and <em>Chain of Command.</em></p>
<h2>A-Side of <em>Ample Destruction</em></h2>
<p>With five tracks, the A-side of <em>Ample Destruction </em>is one of the stronger album A-sides. On the one hand, this isn’t exactly rare because there are plenty of albums that either A-side-heavy or have good distribution on <em>both sides. </em>Then again, you also have albums that can be an ordeal together because of a boggy A-side with only a smattering of bangers, rippers, or pounders or it’s lop-sided with all the good stuff on the B-side.</p>
<p>The thing with this is the A-side is typically the first album or the early tracks on an album and you don’t want to <em>have to </em>go through a mid or bad A-side just to get to the actual A-side material. A heads up: this album falls into the first category with a strong distribution of bangers on both sides and no skips.</p>
<p><em>Ample Destruction </em>opens with the banger “License to Kill”, the shortest song on side A and the album overall at just over 3-minutes and it gives the album a strong start and is a nice sample of what you’re getting into with Jag Panzer. I feel it’s a good introduction to Harry Conklin’s singing ability but it isn’t the best example on the album. Following “License to Kill” are “Warfare” and “Symphony of Terror”. “Warfare” is a strong follow-up pounder and “Symphony of Terror” a more of a mid-tempo, building epic. Again, it showcases Conklin’s singing throughout and really lets him do his thing on chorus.</p>
<p>Closing out the A-side are the star tracks “Harder Than Steel”, a tune that picks up the pack just a bit but keeps the pounder approach. I often mention this song as a good example of epic heavy metal or U.S power metal. The guitars have that bite you’ll hear in “License to Kill” and “Warfare” and the dazzle of “Symphony of Terror” but it has a little more umph or speed to it. However, it’s not the speeder of this side.</p>
<p>That honor goes to A-side closer “Generally Hostile”, one of the two speed metal entries of the album. The song gallops, rides, and has a lot of punch to it. It’s also my favorite vocal display for Conklin on the album. I talk a lot about the vocals but the guitars and drums do their job and then some throughout the project. Whatever the theme or story of the song, they lay a great stage in each track for Conklin to paint the picture.</p>
<p><strong>Standout Tracks: </strong>Symphony of Terror**, Harder Than Steel**, Generally Hostile**</p>
<h2>B-Side</h2>
<p>After a heavy A-side, we have “The Watching” which a slower, somewhat grim tune that clocks in at over four minutes. I’d say this song, B-sider “Reign of Tyrants”, “Symphony of Terror” and closing track “The Crucifix” are good introductions to Conklin’s band after Jag Panzer, Satan’s Host. Those are three songs that could easily be on their debut album <em>Metal from Hell. </em>Speaking of “The Crucifix”, it’s longest song on this debut at over seven minutes.</p>
<p>Often when I see lengthier song times, I tend to think “This is going to be a slow affair” and I might give the faster songs another listen to prep me. After doing that, I got into “The Crucifix” and the first three minutes and change seemed to confirm my fears. Then it kicks into the second half of track and the tempo picks up. I was pleased and it went together well enough that I couldn’t say “Just give me the second half of the song.” The entire song is fine but in the mix of the first nine, I don’t see it as a particularly strong closing song. It’s definitely a closer but I don’t know about it on <em>Ample Destruction. </em></p>
<p>One reason for that is that the version I listened to was a re-issue which featured the bonus “Black Sunday”. I felt that would’ve made a better closer as it’s similar in tempo but brief at under three minutes. Before closing this out, we can’t forget “Cardiac Arrest”. Falling between “The Watching” and “Reign of Tyrants”, “Cardiac Arrest” is the other speed metal offering. While doesn’t have that same gasoline and fire as “Generally Hostile”, it gives the B-side a shot of energy on a mostly mid-tempo, heavy-leaning side.</p>
<p><strong>Standout Tracks: </strong>The Watching*, Cardiac Arrest**</p>
<h2>Strength of the Debut</h2>
<p>I tend not to put grades or scores on these since they’re more retrospectives or quick dives than reviews but this a debut I would’ve given at least four stars or a low-90. It’s a great debut album and while it’s a cult album, it’s a classic of power metal and epic heavy metal. It showcases that early 80s period in U.S power metal and was how I discovered other U.S power metal acts from that period such as Brocas Helm, Manilla Road, Chastain, and Omen.</p>
<p>Admittedly, if I had discovered any of those bands first, I would’ve found Jag Panzer but this album was good enough and hit all those spots that I dig in metal music: strong, piercing vocals, fantasy or warfare lyricism, and guitar work that boosts or blends with the direction of the band and the singer’s abilities.</p>
<p><em>Ample Destruction </em>is a ridiculously strong debut and highly recommended.</p>
<div class="single-content has-left-section">
<div class="entry-content clearfix">
<p>Staff Writer;<strong> James “Metal” Swift Jr.</strong></p>
<p>This talented writer is also a podcast host, and comic book fan who loves all things old school. One may also find him on Twitter at; <strong><a href="http://twitter.com/metalswift">metalswift</a></strong>.</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thebrhm.com/2026/06/20/debut-dives-jag-panzer-ample-destruction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judas Priest Redeemer Of Souls Album Review: More Than A Decade Later.</title>
		<link>https://thebrhm.com/2026/06/18/judas-priest-redeemer-of-souls-album-review/</link>
					<comments>https://thebrhm.com/2026/06/18/judas-priest-redeemer-of-souls-album-review/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James “Metal” Swift Jr.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 03:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Album Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mainstream Heavy Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy Metal - Blast From The Past]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BH]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thebrhm.com/?p=1913</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A look back at Judas Priest’s Redeemer Of Souls, its strongest tracks, weaker moments, and why the album remains skippable for new Priest listeners.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(<strong>TheBRHM.com</strong>) While listening to <em>Invincible Shield, </em>I realized that I hadn’t done a review or album dive into <em>Redeemer of Souls </em>or <em>Firepower </em>for <em>The Black Rock and</em> Heavy Metal<em>. </em>Now, I find it very easy—and even relaxing—to look at older albums from decades ago and decide what albums were the strongest of that decade. As a result, most of my time is spent listening to stuff from the 1970s into the 1990s. There’s definitely stuff from within the last 22 years I <em>haven’t </em>listened to but one band I’m pretty caught up on is my personal favorite: Judas Priest.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter  wp-image-1916" src="https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Judas-Priest-Redeemer-Of-Souls-Album-Review_-A-Decade-Plus-Later_png-1024x635.png" alt="Judas Priest Redeemer Of Souls Album Review: More Than A Decade Later." width="664" height="412" srcset="https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Judas-Priest-Redeemer-Of-Souls-Album-Review_-A-Decade-Plus-Later_png-1024x635.png 1024w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Judas-Priest-Redeemer-Of-Souls-Album-Review_-A-Decade-Plus-Later_png-300x186.png 300w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Judas-Priest-Redeemer-Of-Souls-Album-Review_-A-Decade-Plus-Later_png-768x476.png 768w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Judas-Priest-Redeemer-Of-Souls-Album-Review_-A-Decade-Plus-Later_png.png 1483w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 664px) 100vw, 664px" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>One of the things I wanted to do was touch on each Priest album before really digging into the best and worst parts of the band’s iconic releases. So, while there’s still<em> Invincible Shield </em>from 2024 to look at let’s take a gander at <em>Redeemer or Souls—</em>for a refresher or first look. This album was significant as it was the first album without long-time Priest guitarist and co-founder K.K Downing, the entrance of Richie Faulkner, and pretty much sharpened the sound of <em>Angel of Retribution.</em></p>
<p>When it comes to Judas Priest, I tend to say follow their “of” albums to trace their sound and how it grows over time. The sound here is a more seasoned  version of what we heard on <em>Angel of Retribution.</em></p>
<h2>The First Act of ‘Redeemer of Souls’</h2>
<p>So, <em>Redeemer of Souls </em>starts off with “Dragonaut” which wasn’t the strongest song to run as an opener on the album but this wasn’t your usual Priest album. If anything you could say it was lacking in firepower a bit throughout. The second and third tracks had stronger claims to being an opener but this is the track arrangement we have.</p>
<p>Again, the arrangement can make for a totally different listening experience in most cases. In the case of <em>Redeemer of Souls—</em>eh. Who knows? This album had a strong concentration of mediocre tunes and stuff that could’ve been left off. That’s another thing: less is more sometimes. While many artists drop releases with 15-20 tracks, oftentimes they can get it done with 10-15 of the strongest tracks on the album and have a near-untouchable release.</p>
<p>In the first half, we have standout tunes in the titular track and “Halls of Valhalla”. I feel they “Halls” is the stronger of the two. They sounded like they could’ve been bangers on <em>Angel of Retribution </em>easily. A tune that wasn’t going to be a banger but still had some muscle to it was “March of the Damned”. It was <em>just </em>above mid but I wouldn’t call it a highlight among the first seven tunes.</p>
<p><strong>Strongest Tracks: </strong>Redeemer of Souls, Halls of Valhalla*</p>
<h2>Act Two</h2>
<p>The second act features six tracks capping off this 13-track journey. Now the first three tracks on this side of “Cold Blooded”, “Metalizer” and”Crossfire”? Not particularly bad. These songs could’ve been on <em>Angel of Retribution</em> with stronger nods to “Metalizer” and “Crossfire”. They have a shortness to them which make them punchy and at this point in Priest’s run, I prefer screeching Rob Halford with a punchy, powerful Priest.</p>
<p>Once we get to the last three tracks, we’re in longer tunes territory and I won’t lie, it didn’t work for me. This is a hard assortment of tracks to try and rearrange for the stronger album. Some songs—like these three—run a little long and if you tune out and let the music just run the speakers, you won’t know where one song ends and another begins. I often caught on that “Battle Cry” was playing because I’d heard it a bit before listening to the full album.</p>
<p>Oddly, this was one of those time where the B-side <em>didn’t </em>totally show the A-side how it’s done.</p>
<p><strong>Strongest Tracks: </strong>Metalizer, Crossfire</p>
<h2>Recommendation: Skip</h2>
<p>By the time we reach track eight, this album really just flows from one song to the next without any song after the third really standing out up until this point. That’s not entirely a bad thing but you could say it is when the album had been in the works for three years and it’s six years after the last release. Not only that, it was a release that many were mixed on. I’d say the average take on <em>Nostradamus </em>from those I asked has been “It’s alright.”</p>
<p>Meaning <em>Redeemer </em>just had to be better than “Alright” or at least match it. Unfortunately, it was a bit flat listening to it years later. It’s odd because I actually remember enjoying this album for the most part. If you’re exploring Priest for the first time, I’d say this isn’t the best introduction. If you’re rusty, this one is skippable and didn’t get better after a decade of marination.</p>
<p>Staff Writer;<strong> M. Swift</strong></p>
<p>This talented writer is also a podcast host, and comic book fan who loves all things old school. One may also find him on Twitter at; <strong><a href="http://twitter.com/metalswift">metalswift</a></strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thebrhm.com/2026/06/18/judas-priest-redeemer-of-souls-album-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blind Guardian’s Battalions Of Fear Still Hits Like A Speed Metal Classic.</title>
		<link>https://thebrhm.com/2026/06/15/blind-guardians-battalions-of-fear-still-hits-like-a-speed-metal-classic/</link>
					<comments>https://thebrhm.com/2026/06/15/blind-guardians-battalions-of-fear-still-hits-like-a-speed-metal-classic/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James “Metal” Swift Jr.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 01:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Heavy Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mainstream Heavy Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy Metal - Blast From The Past]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Album Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BH]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thebrhm.com/?p=1910</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Blind Guardian’s 1988 debut Battalions Of Fear delivered fast riffs, fantasy themes, and early power metal energy that still holds up decades later.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(<strong>TheBRHM.com</strong>) This time we’re looking at extremely strong debuts! We’ll start with a band we’ve discussed a bit before in Blind Guardian with their 1988 debut <em>Battalions of Fear.</em></p>
<h2>What Type of Vibe Is Blind Guardian?</h2>
<p>To be honest, there are different vibes with Blind Guardian’s music. It can depend on the decade or the particular project. For most of their discography BG is pretty intense and that’s mostly on the pace of albums and the band’s playing speed.</p>
<p>Blind Guardian is one of the pioneering bands of what speed metal—my favorite genre—would become in the 1980s. The genre had already been established with albums such as Judas Priest’s <em>Sad Wings of Destiny, </em>Motorhead’s debut album, and Riot’s <em>Rock City.</em></p>
<p>With the bands that made it out of the New Wave of British Heavy Metal—the ones that found success and fame—you&#8217;d hear a lot of speed metal on albums. There was a mixing of UK punk and heavier rock music during this period. The result of a mix of bands with more mid-tempo approach and some that were faster but had their mid-tempo moments.</p>
<p>These albums would make it outside of England and influence younger bands that were experimenting with their sound—such as Blind Guardian in the late 80s. So, for their sound, BG was definitely faster early on. The band mixed this speedy approach with fantasy and <em>Lord of the Rings</em>-inspired lyrics.</p>
<p>It was a new and fun experience when I first heard this classic German outfit, I had dove into speed metal and thrash metal. All of it was aggressive with songs about Hell, destruction, violence, nuclear war, politics, and so on. So, this was extremely refreshing.</p>
<p>There was still this aggressive, fast approach that I <em>love </em>but it had its moments where it would get away from that for a moment. When I researched Blind Guardian more, I found that this was also one of the bands that would pioneer power metal—another favorite genre—and it made sense.</p>
<p>In short, if you like some umph to your fantasy tales and epic legends, Blind Guardian has you most of the time. As the 90s and 00s rolled around, BG mixed in some more mid-tempo pieces as their albums became more conceptual and featured more of an atmosphere to tell stories.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter wp-image-1100" src="https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Blind-Guardian-Battalions-of-Fear-1024x800.jpg" alt="Blind Guardian’s Battalions Of Fear Still Hits Like A Speed Metal Classic." width="483" height="378" srcset="https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Blind-Guardian-Battalions-of-Fear-1024x800.jpg 1024w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Blind-Guardian-Battalions-of-Fear-300x234.jpg 300w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Blind-Guardian-Battalions-of-Fear-768x600.jpg 768w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Blind-Guardian-Battalions-of-Fear-1536x1200.jpg 1536w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Blind-Guardian-Battalions-of-Fear-2048x1600.jpg 2048w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Blind-Guardian-Battalions-of-Fear-450x352.jpg 450w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Blind-Guardian-Battalions-of-Fear-780x609.jpg 780w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Blind-Guardian-Battalions-of-Fear-1600x1250.jpg 1600w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 483px) 100vw, 483px" /></p>
<h2>The Performance of Battalions of Fear</h2>
<p>This album is a total beast from start to finish. Hell, I’m far from the biggest instrumental fan but the two instrumentals that are on the A-side and B-side (the third and eighth tracks, respectively) were really good. As I’ve always said, I’m a big vocals and lyrics guy, so instrumentals really have to add to the album’s pace or atmosphere.</p>
<p>From “Majesty”, the album opener to “Battalions of Fear”, the last lyrical track, this album doesn’t let up pace-wise. It’s a fun, fast album that blitzes you with semi-related but commonly-themed adventures, lore, and the like. These are themes you’d want in music that is more mid-paced or slower so that you can digest the stories and stuff.</p>
<p>In BG’s case, it’s taking out a lot of the exposition and hitting you with the heat seekers. It’s like watching the trailer or a commercial for <em>Lord of the Rings </em>or the later <em>Harry Potter </em>films where the most exciting or dramatic parts are shown. That’s <em>Battalions of Fear </em>and the follow-up.</p>
<p>The original album is a 37-minute trailer to reel the listener in on their sound and material—and works! Their first two albums just reel you in and then you start to get the full movie or whole book approach with the 90s albums.</p>
<p>As a matter of fact, as unrefined as <em>Battalions of Fear </em>can sound at times when compared with their recent albums, I’d say that not only is <em>BoF </em>a great debut but probably one of the greatest. BG’s sound came a long way in albums 35 years of making metal.</p>
<p>I’d even recommend listening to the bonus edition. It’s available on Spotify and iTunes and features some demo material which is often times rawer than the released studio albums.</p>
<h2>Power of the Opener: “Majesty”</h2>
<p>The opening track on <em>Battalions of Fear </em>is “Majesty” which clocks in at seven and a half minutes. It’s not a fast seven minutes, either. You are cognizant that you’ve been on this song for some time and that it hasn’t bled over into another song. No, this is still the same song and you’re just four minutes through it.</p>
<p>That aside, it’s a lengthy track with a strong, fast-pace. If it were a little faster it would be exhausting, actually. Keeping that pace for anything over three or four minutes? Insanity! Four minutes is pushing it before I start considering pressing “next”. However, there are tracks that either ride the full time at full speed or tracks that ride fast, give you a short breather, and continue riding.</p>
<p>“Majesty” falls in the latter category. There is a momentum of breathing space before the pace ramps back up. This is a damn good opening track and a good pick as here are some other lengthy songs on the album which hit five and six minutes.</p>
<p>I couldn’t picture “Majesty” being in the middle of the album and at least not on the A-side. However, a good replacement opener would definitely be “Run for the Night”. It rides harder than “Majesty” at less time. However, it lacks that little extra that would make it a <em>better </em>opener. “Run for the Night” is a song for after you’ve caught Blind Guardian’s pace and approach. It’s not exactly the first BG song I’d pick as an intro if time wasn’t an issue.</p>
<p>Staff Writer;<strong> M. Swift</strong></p>
<p>This talented writer is also a podcast host, and comic book fan who loves all things old school. One may also find him on Twitter at; <strong><a href="http://twitter.com/metalswift">metalswift</a></strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thebrhm.com/2026/06/15/blind-guardians-battalions-of-fear-still-hits-like-a-speed-metal-classic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Queen’s 1973 Debut Album Still Sounds Heavy, Fast, And Fearless.</title>
		<link>https://thebrhm.com/2026/06/08/queen-1973-debut-album-review/</link>
					<comments>https://thebrhm.com/2026/06/08/queen-1973-debut-album-review/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James “Metal” Swift Jr.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 01:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Rock and Roll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rock - Blast From The Past.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy Metal - Blast From The Past]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Album Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rock Music]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thebrhm.com/?p=1904</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A review of Queen’s 1973 self titled debut album, from hard rock bite to progressive fire, standout tracks, and Freddie Mercury’s early power.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(<strong>TheBRHM.com</strong>) We’re getting into a bit of hard rock for “Greatest Album Debuts” with the 1973 self-titled release by Queen. On this release, you’ll get a mix of 70s hard rock and progressive rock but the prog element when <em>mixed </em>with that hard rock gives us something similar to speed metal. Think the songs “Motörhead”, Uriah Heep’s “Birds of Prey”, “Road Racin’” by Riot and Deep Purple’s “Highway Star.”</p>
<p>Definitely hard rock but there’s speed and weight to it. Most of these songs don’t have that slower blues mosey or rockabilly bounce you’ll hear in energetic songs from AC/DC or Kiss. Also, pay attention to what Freddie Mercury is able to do with his voice <em>on the debut.</em></p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter wp-image-1764" src="https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/chrome-capture-2025-1-2.png" alt="Greatest Album Debuts: Queen (1973)." width="614" height="305" srcset="https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/chrome-capture-2025-1-2.png 825w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/chrome-capture-2025-1-2-300x149.png 300w, https://thebrhm.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/chrome-capture-2025-1-2-768x382.png 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 614px) 100vw, 614px" /></p>
<h2>The A-Side</h2>
<p>I’ve done a few albums from the 1970s and 1980s where we have a 10-track release that manages to keep things under 40 minutes. In those cases, the album is usually split eventually across the two sides. With <em>Queen, </em>we an A-side with <em>four </em>tracks but that’s because a few songs are a bit on the beefy side length-wise.</p>
<p>There are two tracks that really caught my attention here in the two “King” songs. “Great King Rat” comes in with speed and heaviness which I love, of course. It’s not what you’d get from speed metal in the 1980s but it was similar to a song on New York band Riot’s first two albums. I’d something like “Road Racin’” or “Warrior.”</p>
<p>As mentioned in our review of Riot, those first two albums—also released in the 1970s—were hard rock with a speed metal song tucked in there somewhere. Queen was definitely cooking with something here—they were cooking throughout the album—but this song and the other A-side banger <em>really </em>intrigued me.</p>
<p>Before getting into that one, “Keep Yourself Alive” deserves a nod for opening the album with some bite. There’s such a mix on this album that if you’re someone who needs some fire off the bat—like myself—this track does the job.</p>
<p>“My Fairy King” is my favorite track on the album. It reminds me of something I would hear on a Rainbow album—and that gets a massive thumbs up. <em>Queen </em>released before <em>Ritchie Blackmore’s Rainbow</em> but the more of that and Uriah Heep I hear here, the better.</p>
<p>I’m not the biggest progressive rock fan and <em>Queen </em>isn’t just dominated by it but what prog is here leans more towards the faster, heavy end. That works for me.</p>
<p><strong><em>Standout Tracks: </em></strong>Great King Rat**, My Fairy King***</p>
<h2>The B-Side</h2>
<p>The B-side is pretty damn good throughout. It opens with “Liar” which has the same bite and oomph as “Keep Yourself Alive.” Things slow down quite a bit with “The Night Comes Down” which is a fine song and the only track on the album that catch me off the bat. It would be replayed but on the first run through, it didn’t get any replays.</p>
<p>“Son and Daughter” and “Jesus” were the replay magnets on the B-side. I <em>really </em>enjoyed “Son and Daughter” it was right along what I like about “Great King Rat” with the heaviness. The album closes with “Jesus” and the instrumental “Seven Seas of Rhye.”</p>
<p>Instrumentals rarely do it for me but the closer was a brief one and decent. Again, there was a lot going down in under 40-minutes.</p>
<p><strong><em>Standout Tracks: </em></strong>Liar*, Son and Daughter**, Jesus</p>
<h2>Strength of the Opener: Keep Yourself Alive</h2>
<p>My replacements for opener tend to come from the standout tracks on both sides. “Keep Yourself Alive” does a fine job as an opening track but either of the two “King” songs would be my top two picks for that slot. I love an album that starts off with dynamite, high energy—some fire and fury.</p>
<p>“Keep Yourself Alive” has both but “Great King Rat” is a stronger song and “My Fairy King” is even stronger! “GKR” is a bit lengthy for an explosive opener but part of this song’s strength comes from keeping that aggressiveness throughout.</p>
<p>“Son and Daughter” would make for a good opener as well and is punchy in length to where it doesn’t stick around too long.</p>
<p>Overall—like others who have reviewed or recommended <em>Queen—</em>I believe this album shows a lot of the potential that Queen would realize in the 1970s and 1980s. There were a few songs that were fine and many that were good or better. You can hear Queen showcasing “We can do this and that—oh and this! Plus we have this awesome singer and amazing guitarists!”</p>
<p>This album isn’t a collection of Queen’s best but they do deliver some bangers that make me wonder “What if they went this route?” and “I’d love more of this and less of that.” <em>Queen </em>encourages possibilities and ups anticipation for the follow-up and that gets a thumbs up.</p>
<p>Staff Writer;<strong> James “Metal” Swift Jr.</strong></p>
<p>This talented writer is also a podcast host, and comic book fan who loves all things old school. One may also find him on Twitter at; <strong><a href="http://twitter.com/metalswift">metalswift</a></strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thebrhm.com/2026/06/08/queen-1973-debut-album-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
